EU Survey Finds Millions of Workers Face Cancer Risk

A landmark survey from the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work has delivered a sobering assessment of workplace safety, revealing that an estimated 47 million workers across the European Union were likely exposed to at least one cancer-causing agent in a single work week. This extensive Workers’ Exposure Survey (WES) provides the most definitive evidence to date on the pervasiveness of occupational cancer risks, highlighting significant and widespread deficiencies in existing preventative measures. The findings underscore a pressing public health crisis and signal an urgent need for targeted, evidence-based interventions to protect the health of Europe’s workforce and mitigate the devastating burden of work-related cancer.

The Scope and Key Dangers

Survey Scope and Top Exposures

The Workers’ Exposure Survey, conducted between September 2022 and February 2023, gathered extensive data from a vast pool of 98.5 million workers across six representative EU Member States: Germany, Ireland, Spain, France, Hungary, and Finland. This comprehensive analysis identified five carcinogens as the most common sources of occupational exposure. Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation emerged as a pervasive environmental risk for individuals working outdoors. Diesel engine exhaust emissions were found to be common in sectors such as transportation, logistics, construction, and vehicle maintenance. Industrial chemicals like benzene and respirable crystalline silica were pinpointed as significant risks in specific processes and industries, including construction and mining. Uniquely, formaldehyde exposure was not concentrated in a few high-risk sectors but was found to be broadly distributed across the general working population. An estimated 6.4% of all workers were likely exposed to formaldehyde from diverse sources, such as working with materials like glue and plywood or in more acute situations like firefighting and the off-gassing that occurs when opening shipping containers.

High-Intensity and Combined Risks

Beyond identifying the most common threats, the survey data underscored the alarming intensity and complexity of these workplace exposures. A critical theme emerging from the report is that many workers are not just exposed, but are subjected to high levels of carcinogens that significantly elevate their risk. The data revealed that wood dust exposure is particularly severe, with half of all affected workers experiencing high-level exposure, a figure that represents a staggering 1.6% of the entire surveyed workforce. More broadly, approximately 11.1% of all workers were found to be exposed to at least one of the 24 studied carcinogens at a high level. Further complicating the issue is the prevalence of simultaneous exposures to multiple agents. The survey found that 26.1% of workers—more than one in four—were likely exposed to at least two different cancer risk factors within the same week. This compounding of risks creates a dangerous synergistic effect, where the combined health impact can be far greater than the sum of individual exposures, posing a formidable challenge for occupational health and safety protocols.

Vulnerable Groups and Systemic Failures

Workforce Disparities and Uneven Risk

The comprehensive survey data revealed that the burden of occupational cancer risk is not shouldered equally across the workforce, with clear overarching trends demonstrating that certain demographic and employment groups are disproportionately affected. This highlights systemic vulnerabilities that demand tailored intervention strategies. For instance, self-employed and temporary workers were found to often face higher exposure rates than their permanently employed counterparts, suggesting that non-standard work arrangements may correlate with weaker safety protocols, less access to protective equipment, or a greater likelihood of being hired for high-risk jobs. Age was also a factor; older workers demonstrated a higher probability of being exposed to multiple risk factors simultaneously, though often at lower individual intensities, likely reflecting cumulative exposure over a long career. Furthermore, exposure patterns diverged significantly between men and women. The survey attributed this difference primarily to occupational segregation, a phenomenon where genders are concentrated in different sectors and job types that carry varying intrinsic risks. These disparities underscore that a generic, one-size-fits-all approach to prevention is fundamentally inadequate for protecting all workers.

Widespread Gaps in Protective Measures

A central and deeply concerning conclusion from the survey is the inconsistent and often inadequate implementation of the control measures designed to protect workers from known carcinogens. The WES examined how workplaces manage exposure risks and discovered a wide and unacceptable variation in the use of essential controls such as proper ventilation, enclosed systems for handling hazardous substances, and personal protective equipment (PPE). While some highly regulated sectors, like chemical laboratories, reported a consistent and rigorous application of technical controls, many other industries lag significantly behind. The findings indicate that in numerous settings, crucial controls are used only occasionally or, alarmingly, not at all. A particularly stark example provided is the exposure to diesel engine exhaust emissions during vehicle maintenance activities. In this common scenario, more than two-thirds of exposed workers reported that they took no protective measures whatsoever. This evidence points to a widespread failure to adhere to the established hierarchy of prevention, which rightfully prioritizes eliminating hazards at the source over a simple reliance on personal protection, signaling a profound need for a more robust and consistent safety culture across all sectors.

Informing Policy and a Call for Unified Action

The release of these findings was intended not merely as a report but as a direct catalyst for concrete policy reform and unified action. As stated by EU-OSHA’s executive director, William Cockburn, the reality that nearly half of European workers were probably exposed to carcinogens, with millions facing high-level or multiple exposures, is unacceptable. With over 100,000 people in the EU losing their lives to work-related cancer each year, these findings confirmed an urgent need for decisive intervention. The robust and comparable data from the WES was immediately positioned to inform critical EU-level initiatives. It directly supported the European Commission’s ongoing process to update legislation on carcinogens, mutagens, and reprotoxic substances at work. Moreover, the findings bolstered the goals of the EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2021-2027, Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan, and the EU Roadmap on Carcinogens. The ultimate consensus viewpoint that emerged was that effective prevention must be multi-faceted and precisely targeted, utilizing sector-specific and worker-centered approaches to meaningfully reduce risks and protect the health of the European workforce.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later